In the United States, six corporations, headquartered mostly in New York, control the vast majority of the traditional media industry (television, radio, movies, books, music). While five corporations, headquartered mostly in California, control most of the tech media industry (social media, internet search, online distribution). These are by definition oligopolies; a market structure in which a small number of firms has the large majority of market share.

The traditional media oligopoly came about gradually. It started in the 1980s, with the trend towards corporate ownership of the media, and concentration via mergers. In 1983: 50 companies controlled 90% of the traditional media industry, but by 2011: 6 corporations controlled 90%.

Notes: although News Corp and 21st Century Fox spit into separate corporations in 2013, they can be thought of as one entity since they are both controlled by the Murdoch family.  Similarly, CBS and Viacom split in 2005, but are both subsidiaries of, and controlled by, National Amusements. Verizon is not normally counted as a player in the media oligopoly as they only hold HuffPost, and the somewhat irrelevant Yahoo and AOL. The above diagram only shows the most popular brand assets, there are more than could fit.



I. Corporations all share a common internal structure; employees serve officers, who serve the board, who exist to maximize shareholder return. Corporate employees have low autonomy, and high loyalty to industry.

II. In an oligopoly, the circle of majority market share participants pay a lot of attention to each other, calculate the likely responses of the other participants (game theory), and may outright collude.  

III. Costs are lowered, and profits maximized, when the market players work together to supply a homogeneous product. Example: common narratives, with slight variation.

IV. Geographically concentrated headquarters lead to groupthink. The 14 corporations in the diagram are based in New York (7), San Francisco (4), LA (2), Philadelphia (1), and Seattle (1). Viacom has dual HQ.

V. Political correctness controls behavior, and is strongest in precisely the cities where the media corporations are headquartered, which leads to more groupthink.

VI. Media corporations hire from the same journalism schools, and discriminate in favor of left-wing ideology and Democratic Party affiliation, which leads to even more groupthink.



I. All corporations are programmed, by law, to maximize profit to shareholders (a concept known as shareholder primacy). This is every corporation's primary function (see essay on corporatism).

II. Profits to individual corporations are not truly maximized, unless they cooperate to maximize the aggregate profits of the corporate family (S&P500 profits).

III. Media corporations use their influence to push their internal ideology (see postmodernism, political correctness, etc), and suppress competing ideologies.

IV. Media corporations use their influence to push Democratic Party candidates (generally), and defame opposition candidates. They also cooperate with the government on national interests.

V. Media corporations provide services to the stakeholders such as news, entertainment, search results, social media platforms, etc. However, this is a secondary function (subordinate to profit maximization), and once markets are cornered by an oligopoly or monopoly structure, corporations are less incentivized to take interest in stakeholder concerns.



Trust in the mass media peaked in 1976 at 72%, and has steadily decreased since the 1980s, reaching an all-time low of 32% in 2016. Over the last 40 years, media trust has shown a strong inverse correlation with corporate ownership, and industry concentration. 

Americans' Trust in Mass Media

% "Great deal" or "Fair amount", Gallup Poll

Media trust differs dramatically by political party affiliation. This makes sense when you consider mass media is run almost entirely out of New York and California, states which are ideologically strong-left. However, it's not just Republicans, but independents too, who report decreasing trust. Only 51% of Democrats, 30% of Independents, and 14% of Republicans trust the media "a fair amount."

Trust in Mass Media, by Party

% "Great deal" or "Fair amount," Gallup Poll

When you understand that corporations are not programmed to serve stakeholder interests (customers and the general public), but only their shareholders, the trend in deteriorating public trust makes sense. Yet despite this steadily decreasing trust, profits have steadily increased.



Profits of the traditional media oligopoly were $27 billion in 2016, up from $14 billion in 2011. This group is represented by eight tickers, that trade on the NYSE/NASDAQ exchanges (CMCSA, DIS, TWX, FOXA, CBS, VIAB, NWSA, NYT). Profits of the new tech media oligopoly were $77 billion in 2016, up from $37 billion in 2011 (GOOGL, FB, TWTR, AAPL, AMZN). Together these two groups of concentrated players generate over $100 billion in annual profit. Note, these are total corporate profits, and so also include some non-media earnings.

American adults spend 10 hours and 39 minutes per day consuming media. Of this, 4 hours and 31 minutes is spent watching television (chart). This is an average exposure for the U.S. adult population of 75 hours per week, which gives the media industry incredible power to influence thinking, and behavior. 



It is important to call things what they are, not what they were, or pretend to be. The American mass media industry no longer consists of 50 smaller companies competing with each other, and striving for public trust, as it did in the 1970s. Today the market consists of just six large corporations which control 90% of traditional media, plus the new tech media corporations. 

And yet these profit-maximizing corporations still use an idealized terminology, which includes terms such as "free press" and "journalists," as this gives credibility to their operations. However, for the consumer of mass media, these terms are counterproductive to a reality-based understanding of today's industry. Terms such as "corporate media" and "corporate employees," dryly and accurately describe the subjects without creating unrealistic expectations. 

Remember to follow me on Facebook and Twitter for more industry analysis, and critiques of corporatism.